<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss xmlns:atom='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' version='2.0'><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6837226</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 07:16:24 +0000</lastBuildDate><title>Orange &amp; Yellow Jelly Beans</title><description/><link>http://www.orangeandyellowjellybeans.com/index.htm</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (AcusticThoughts)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>302</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6837226.post-7440209401764483735</guid><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 07:06:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-07-03T03:16:24.598-04:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>solar power</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>acusticthoughts</category><title>More Solar Power Ingenuity</title><description>Solar Powered Curtains&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The revolution in energy will come in many tiny dispersed pieces. There will be &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4_lSxhTatUU"&gt;solar powered cars,&lt;/a&gt; solar powered cell phones, there will be &lt;a href="http://www.voltaicsystems.com/bag_backpack.shtml"&gt;solar powered backpacks&lt;/a&gt; that charge all kinds of things, and I believe there will be a little thing that someone makes for purpose of art that will make energy which I call the solar powered tree. The tree will simply have hundreds of little tiny solar panels hanging from it, spinning in the wind, and slowly we will populate large areas with these tiny and cheap little devices and suck the energy from vast landscapes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com"&gt;CNN&lt;/a&gt; has an article about a scientist who is trying to get &lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/science/07/01/solar.textiles/index.html"&gt;Solar Power Generating Curtains&lt;/a&gt; big time into the public consciousness. Solar power is all over. We'll get at it.</description><link>http://www.orangeandyellowjellybeans.com/2008/07/more-solar-power-ingenuity.htm</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (AcusticThoughts)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6837226.post-6596515792521640212</guid><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 06:54:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-07-03T03:05:56.638-04:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>the intarnet thing</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>acusticthoughts</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>infomration</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>freedom</category><title>WikiLeaks</title><description>&lt;a href="http://wikileaks.org/"&gt;WikiLeaks&lt;/a&gt; has become big news recently. I have heard of it here and there in the news, it became part of my constant thought process when a judge in California tried to take it offline because of a banking scandal. It has suddenly become something of significance in that it is influencing and affects the various very powerful groups - the US Government, The Church of Scientology and eventually, maybe, it will affect how businesses decide to act.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The basic premise of WikiLeaks is that it is a website where whistleblowers can publish information without retribution as their identities will be hidden. The hope is that WikiLeaks can stay independent and defend its sources while creating enough of a presence that individuals will know where to go with information that should be shared with the public. There is a big quote on the front page from Time Magazine talking about how it upholds journalistic ideas.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I like it. I like the concept. I believe in these times of strengthening state governments and the technology they harness we individuals need a buffer to keep those powers that be acting in an appropriate manner.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Take a minute and &lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/politics/onlinerights/news/2008/07/wikileaks"&gt;read the Wired&lt;/a&gt; article that got me thinking again about WikiLeaks. Good writing.</description><link>http://www.orangeandyellowjellybeans.com/2008/07/wikileaks.htm</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (AcusticThoughts)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6837226.post-2299804938559381794</guid><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 06:35:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-07-03T02:39:12.373-04:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>freedom fighters</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>capitalism</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>acusticthoughts</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>america</category><title>Just a thought as we approach July 4th</title><description>from an article in &lt;a href="http://www.capmag.com/index.asp"&gt;"Capitalism Magazine"&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.capmag.com/article.asp?ID=5217"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"Put the "Independence" Back in Independence Day"&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by &lt;a href="http://www.capmag.com/author.asp?name=74"&gt;Michael Berliner &lt;/a&gt;   (June 26, 2008)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"Political independence is not a primary. It rests on a more fundamental type of independence: the independence of the human mind. It is the ability of a human being to think for himself and guide his own life that makes political independence possible and necessary. The government as envisaged by the Founding Fathers existed to protect the freedom to think and to act on one's thinking. If human beings were unable to reason, to think for themselves, there would be no autonomy or independence for a government to protect. It is this independence that defines the American Revolution and the American spirit."</description><link>http://www.orangeandyellowjellybeans.com/2008/07/just-thought-as-we-approach-july-4th.htm</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (AcusticThoughts)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6837226.post-6491028603937403238</guid><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 02:36:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-07-02T22:51:28.500-04:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>economics</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>oil</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>acusticthoughts</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>accountability</category><title>Good &amp; Expensive Gas</title><description>I am a student of economics. I believe that many of our issues in life can be attributed to economics. Obesity - cheap food. Pollution - unrecognized consequences (and thus no financial consequences). Waste - cheap whatever we are wasting. Lack of Education - cheap jobs. War - underpaid leadership. If things were to appropriately represent their cost and value then our habits would change as the cost of those things changed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I know I may piss of people when I say this, but like mom or dad said, "You won't understand this until your older, but this is in your best interest." I am HAPPY to see the price of gas go up. We have gotten fat and lazy and because of this we are losing our edge. This "we" that I speak of is mostly aimed at the United States citizenry because that is where I see the consequences of cheap gas. Our electricity is cheap so we leave everything running all day long. Our gas is cheap so we drive down the street to the corner store and eat in our cars (with the AC on). So many things we do, just because we can.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Time.com wrote an article talking about &lt;a href="http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1819594_1819592,00.html"&gt;10 Things You Can Like About $4 Gas&lt;/a&gt; and the best part is that none of the things on the list even talk about the international politics or the development of technology.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Lets get on the ball people - accountability pays for itself in the long term - just like mom and dad said.</description><link>http://www.orangeandyellowjellybeans.com/2008/07/good-expensive-gas.htm</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (AcusticThoughts)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6837226.post-1750013421893545579</guid><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 15:52:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-07-01T14:14:55.311-04:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>self-sufficiency</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>the future</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>acusticthoughts</category><title>The Individual Revolution</title><description>The Individual Revolution is upon us.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This isn't new under the sky, it seems more like it is the past reemerging (&lt;a href="http://images.google.com/images?client=firefox-a&amp;amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;amp;hs=9bN&amp;amp;resnum=0&amp;amp;q=bell%20bottoms&amp;amp;um=1&amp;amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;amp;sa=N&amp;amp;tab=wi"&gt;bell bottoms&lt;/a&gt; anyone?). But I see the future holding a lot more power for the individual to do things on their own. It isn't that we won't need big corporations to do certain things, but it is that we will be capable to do certain things on our own more efficiently (read: cheaper) than the big centralized systems. The means of production and distribution are moving.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. Energy Production. This is a big one in my book. The ability to produce energy from your own home and, possibly, sell excess energy off into the grid to power business, local infrastructure and who knows what else. &lt;a href="http://www-personal.umich.edu/%7Ebgoodsel/solar/blog.htm"&gt;This&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=hydrogen-house&amp;amp;sc=rss"&gt;is&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.solarhome.org/"&gt;happening&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://hawaii.gov/dbedt/info/energy/renewable/solar"&gt;already&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2. Home Farming &amp;amp; Hunting. And I am not only talking about the ability to use the backyard to grow tomatoes, but something a little more revolutionary - growing your own meat in the refrigerator. The act of growing your own tomatoes in the back yard is awesome, there are companies who will &lt;a href="http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/07/01/a-capitalist-dream-company-designs-and-maintains-organic-farm-in-your-backyard/"&gt;create an organic farm in your backyard for you&lt;/a&gt;, or you can go it the traditional route and do it yourself in a &lt;a href="http://howto.wired.com/wiki/Build_a_Square_Foot_Garden"&gt;square garden&lt;/a&gt;, you can do it &lt;a href="http://www.ecoyardfarming.com/category/all/"&gt;"naturally,"&lt;/a&gt; or in the big cities maybe you will buy an &lt;a href="http://www.popsci.com/environment/article/2007-07/skyscraper-farms"&gt;indoor farm&lt;/a&gt; plot to go along with your apartment.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What is really interesting though is when we begin to learn to grow meat. Already, scientists have &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_vitro_meat"&gt;grown meat&lt;/a&gt; in the lab. We aren't eating it yet, but give it time. Recently there has been a big push to get some of this &lt;a href="http://www.peta.org/feat_in_vitro_contest.asp"&gt;lab grown food to be palatable&lt;/a&gt; (you'd like to enjoy it wouldn't you?). As soon as we get good at this in the lab, it will then move to industrial production and, like all good things, will slowly move to the level of the individual so that you an I can have a Home Meat Producer.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;3. Working from Home. This one is has been happening for a while now, and is slowly getting stronger as our technologies and understanding of the processes gets better. Small businesses made &lt;a href="http://www.census.gov/csd/susb/susb05.htm"&gt;up greater than 50%&lt;/a&gt; of the workforce in the United States, with greater than 1/3rd of those companies having fewer than 100 employees, according the the US Census Bureau in 2005. As well, in those business that are bigger more and more of these companies are allowing telecommuting because it saves office space, electricity, increases productivity and as a bonus does wonderful things for the environment.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;4. Desktop/Home Manufacturing. Imagine printing your iPod? Apple will no longer handle manufacturing and distribution (sorta how they are now a days) but instead will manage design and marketing (we are there already?). We have been using printers for 20 years already in heavy industrial settings but more recently these printers have gotten into the news again because of the dropping price. Most HomeFab units today are envisioned for much more mundane tasks - creating a new knob for a broken stereo or maybe making add-ons for a cell phone.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Who knows what is next in our evolution. One thing we do know is that it will be different from yesterday.</description><link>http://www.orangeandyellowjellybeans.com/2008/07/individual-revolution.htm</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (AcusticThoughts)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6837226.post-8426464175061926266</guid><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 15:33:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-07-01T11:36:34.343-04:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>solar power</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>cellular</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>the future</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>acusticthoughts</category><title>If ______, then ______</title><description>If I have &lt;a href="http://allafrica.com/stories/200806250015.html"&gt;demand&lt;/a&gt; and I have the &lt;a href="http://www.enn.com/sci-tech/article/37529"&gt;technical capability&lt;/a&gt;, then is it safe to assume that &lt;a href="http://www.ted.com/index.php/speakers/william_kamkwamba.html"&gt;something&lt;/a&gt; will follow?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I am optimistic. So are the people who are doing these things.</description><link>http://www.orangeandyellowjellybeans.com/2008/07/if-then.htm</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (AcusticThoughts)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6837226.post-8856180370422560668</guid><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 07:43:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-07-01T04:00:07.244-04:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>thoughts</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>acusticthoughts</category><title>Meanderings...</title><description>I recently resigned from a position and during that process came to the jarring conclusion that I have no idea what I want to do in this world from a professional standpoint. It would be nice to have a single focus that drives me. I know someone who I went to high school with who became an anesthesiologist. Now, I don't think this person was thinking about that specific job when they left for the world of university, but I do think they now have a wondrous focus.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In my search (yearning) for purpose beyond simply generating money I have looked at a lot of different career courses. In the last couple of days I applied to join the Peace Corps. What would it be like?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I have a degree in political science and have given considerable thought to getting a Masters Degree in Economics (there is a program with the University of Illinois which might let me combine both). Unfortunately I would have to spend a year on a campus in Illinois before I left for the world, but I could deal if I saw a greater purpose.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Something that does interest me though and I wonder where it could lead to -&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Research and build a cheap receiving and distribution tower that could be dropped in the middle of nowhere and powered with renewable resources? Then connect as many technologies to get the signal out as possible (WiFi, Cellular, WiMax and all the other smart things). While doing this work with the local groups to find ways to benefit from this signal. Already cell phones are used to help farmers get the best price for their goods. With training a few individuals could quickly become nurse assistants communicating information out in a professional manner. A few individuals could be trained to write code and possibly be paid by far away companies for their services. A few people could be trained in the customer service industry and utilize VOIP resources. Maybe an eBay expert could be trained to sell the hand carved wares of villagers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If a certain educated population could be created over the course of several years with the support of local government, NGOs and self interested corporate parties an economic structure could be build around a single tower that could change a village, then a region and, eventually, a world.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Of course, I am unemployed and rambling at &lt;a href="http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/rives_on_4_a_m.html"&gt;4 AM&lt;/a&gt;...</description><link>http://www.orangeandyellowjellybeans.com/2008/07/meanderings.htm</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (AcusticThoughts)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6837226.post-1373450199718300991</guid><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 06:56:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-07-01T03:30:54.637-04:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>terror</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>psychology</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>acusticthoughts</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>politics</category><title>Interrogator Redux</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/06/22/america/terror.php?page=1"&gt;To get secrets from a hard-core terrorist, One interrogator spoke softly&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I looked closely at the word "interrogate" this evening as I browsed which news articles to comment on and began to wonder where the word comes from. The reason I wondered is that smack dab in the middle of this word is "terror." "In" "terror" "gate."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;From the perspective of the word's roots - in Latin interro means, roughly, to question closely, to question while in the presence of, to question while accusing of doing something. In essence, you are questioning with a very particular purpose, not just the random type of small talk that goes on in the world. -gate simply means to set something in motion - so adding gate to the end of a word means it is being done, in the present tense.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The reason this word looked caught my attention was because of the content of the article. The United States has chosen to move away from the Geneva Convention over the past seven years because we believed that we knew answers that no one else knew. We knew that in order to protect ourselves we had to torture people into giving us the answers that we wanted.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The United States has been attacking and being attacked in the Middle East and Mediterranean region since our country was founded. Our CIA has funded and trained various groups that we believe benefited us for many purposes (we put Hussein and bin Ladin in positions of power) since at least the 1950s. Unfortunately, 9/11 was the sowing of what we had reaped.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;All of this is a confusing, continual issue that, if we could solve we might not because of the individuals in power who are after financial gain. The United States did approve a plan in the 1960s to create an incident which might incite a public reaction to allow for military actions to occur against a specific target.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And now, after all of these actions in our past we come back to speaking clearly, and slowly to someone who attacked us to learn about them. I can never agree with the fundamentalist ideologies of the world because they are out of touch and reaching for a time that is no longer here. As well, I cannot fully accept and believe in the patterns of economic development that the world has taken because of the costs that we aren't calculating. We really are stealing from future generations in exchange for current ease of living. If we really are capitalists then we would be considering these future generations in our equations because that is in our long term best interests.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Confusing and scary subjects that, today, are real life and need to be paid attention to and dealt with.</description><link>http://www.orangeandyellowjellybeans.com/2008/07/interrogator-redux.htm</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (AcusticThoughts)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6837226.post-2950957202384895740</guid><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 06:43:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-07-01T02:50:26.346-04:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>nature</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>acusticthoughts</category><title>The Untold Life of a Lizard</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-06/amon-uol063008.php"&gt;Herpetologists discover that a Malagasy chameleon spends most of its short life in an egg&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;How would you like to reformat your existence on Earth? Instead of spending nine months on the womb and 80 years walking and talking and doing what we do, why not spend 60 years inside of the womb and then spend 20 years fighting, living, having sex and doing what we do?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;You know...now that I write it out, I am interested. Where do I sign up?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This is an interesting little chameleon. Every year 100% of the population dies. They are born in November during the rainy season. They triple and quadruple in size during their lifetime (four months). They live in a blaze of glory and then the females, sensing the oncoming dry season, lay eggs buried under the sand. Nine months later the little guys come out and start the process over.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So, again, lets go back to the imagination part of this post.&lt;br /&gt;1. Be born.&lt;br /&gt;2. Grow to be full size in a month or two.&lt;br /&gt;3. Sex, war, feeding, living, death.&lt;br /&gt;4. Start over.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Well...I guess this really isn't imagination, it seems kinda like how we are these days (cept for the growing to full size in a month or two part).</description><link>http://www.orangeandyellowjellybeans.com/2008/07/untold-life-of-lizard.htm</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (AcusticThoughts)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6837226.post-794880724330016960</guid><pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 05:19:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-06-29T10:42:40.044-04:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>aids</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>conspiracy</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>stupid human tricks</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>acusticthoughts</category><title>Another Conspiracy Deflated</title><description>I know some of us want ot believe that the &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AIDS_conspiracy_theories#Man-made_origin_of_AIDS"&gt;US government created AIDS&lt;/a&gt;, and I know some of us who want to associate it with the &lt;a href="http://www.nybooks.com/articles/17963"&gt;G~d's will&lt;/a&gt;, but all of you are wrong.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;AIDs has been with human beings &lt;a href="http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2008/625/1"&gt;longer than we realize&lt;/a&gt; and maybe hasn't been with animals as long as we thought. Either way...history is unraveling in front of us (again).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Did you know there are people who don't believe in the &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=fake+moon+landing&amp;amp;ie=utf-8&amp;amp;oe=utf-8&amp;amp;aq=t&amp;amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;amp;client=firefox-a"&gt;moon landing&lt;/a&gt; or believe in an all powerful...never mind that one.</description><link>http://www.orangeandyellowjellybeans.com/2008/06/another-conspiracy-defalted.htm</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (AcusticThoughts)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6837226.post-2993158483346900973</guid><pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 04:54:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-06-29T18:46:25.490-04:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>capitalism</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>acusticthoughts</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>globalization</category><title>Global Gain</title><description>&lt;a href="http://yaleglobal.yale.edu/display.article?id=11008"&gt;A very well written article...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"But the very idea that we need to fear the global rise of living        standards is flawed, because it assumes that everything else stays the        same. It insists we are playing some sort of zero-sum game, and that for        the developing world to rise, those in the West must fall."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_rising_tide_lifts_all_boats"&gt;A rising tide lifts all boats&lt;/a&gt; in a truly long term &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitalism#Perspectives"&gt;Capitalist&lt;/a&gt; world. People have been &lt;a href="http://news.google.com/news?q=credit%20crunch&amp;amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;amp;oe=utf-8&amp;amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;amp;client=firefox-a&amp;amp;um=1&amp;amp;sa=N&amp;amp;tab=wn"&gt;attacking&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=greenspan+housing+bubble+rand&amp;amp;ie=utf-8&amp;amp;oe=utf-8&amp;amp;aq=t&amp;amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;amp;client=firefox-a"&gt;Capitalism&lt;/a&gt; recently, but in reality, they should be &lt;a href="http://news.google.com/news?oe=utf-8&amp;amp;rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&amp;amp;client=firefox-a&amp;amp;um=1&amp;amp;tab=wn&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;q=fbi+mortgage&amp;amp;btnG=Search+News"&gt;attacking&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&amp;amp;client=firefox-a&amp;amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;amp;hs=ms9&amp;amp;pwst=1&amp;amp;resnum=0&amp;amp;q=rating%20agencies%20cdo&amp;amp;um=1&amp;amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;amp;sa=N&amp;amp;tab=wn"&gt;individuals&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Don't let simple minded people push you away from truth.</description><link>http://www.orangeandyellowjellybeans.com/2008/06/global-gain.htm</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (AcusticThoughts)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6837226.post-6188621169860900341</guid><pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 04:28:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-06-29T00:35:21.736-04:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>solar power</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>acusticthoughts</category><title>Examples of society at work on a problem</title><description>&lt;h2 style="font-weight: normal;" class="entry-title"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;Just because there is a lot of talk, it doesn't mean there is much sense to it (&lt;a href="http://news.google.com/news?q=paris%20hilton&amp;amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;amp;oe=utf-8&amp;amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;amp;client=firefox-a&amp;amp;um=1&amp;amp;sa=N&amp;amp;tab=wn"&gt;wtf?&lt;/a&gt;), but here I think we have &lt;a href="http://news.google.com/news?oe=utf-8&amp;amp;rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&amp;amp;client=firefox-a&amp;amp;um=1&amp;amp;tab=wn&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;q=solar+power&amp;amp;btnG=Search+News"&gt;something going on&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;h2 style="font-weight: normal;" class="entry-title"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;a class="entry-title-link" target="_blank" href="http://feeds.technologyreview.com/click.phdo?i=a3c9de5efffc92e318f3378b597c0ae9"&gt;Cheaper &lt;span class="highlighted0"&gt;Solar&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="highlighted1"&gt;Power&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;h2 style="font-weight: normal;" class="entry-title"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;a class="entry-title-link" target="_blank" href="http://rss.slashdot.org/%7Er/Slashdot/slashdot/%7E3/321400439/article.pl"&gt;US Halts Applications For &lt;span class="highlighted0"&gt;Solar&lt;/span&gt; Energy Projects&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;h2 style="font-weight: normal;" class="entry-title"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;a class="entry-title-link" target="_blank" href="http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=ibm-hp-intel-solar-power&amp;amp;sc=rss"&gt;&lt;span class="highlighted0"&gt;Solar&lt;/span&gt; Sell: Companies that Mass Marketed PCs Turn to Photovoltaics [News]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;h2 style="font-weight: normal;" class="entry-title"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;a class="entry-title-link" target="_blank" href="http://yaleglobal.yale.edu/display.article?id=11007"&gt;The Economics of &lt;span class="highlighted0"&gt;Solar&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="highlighted1"&gt;Power&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;h2 style="font-weight: normal;" class="entry-title"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;a class="entry-title-link" target="_blank" href="http://www.europeanvoice.com/Article/61421.aspx"&gt;Energy bills could triple to meet climate goal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;h2 style="font-weight: normal;" class="entry-title"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;a class="entry-title-link" target="_blank" href="http://allafrica.com/stories/200806260303.html"&gt;Africa: &lt;span class="highlighted0"&gt;Solar&lt;/span&gt; Energy the Way to Go - Report&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;h2 style="font-weight: normal;" class="entry-title"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;a class="entry-title-link" target="_blank" href="http://www.enn.com/sci-tech/article/37486"&gt;Utility-Scale &lt;span class="highlighted0"&gt;Solar&lt;/span&gt; Thermal Growing Fast&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;h2 style="font-weight: normal;" class="entry-title"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;a class="entry-title-link" target="_blank" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/%7Er/japantimes/%7E3/319169014/nb20080625a4.html"&gt;METI plans subsidies for home &lt;span class="highlighted0"&gt;solar&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="highlighted1"&gt;power&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;h2 style="font-weight: normal;" class="entry-title"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;a class="entry-title-link" target="_blank" href="http://www.enn.com/energy/article/37463"&gt;Lack of new &lt;span class="highlighted1"&gt;power&lt;/span&gt; lines threatens renewable growth&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;h2 style="font-weight: normal;" class="entry-title"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;a class="entry-title-link" target="_blank" href="http://feeds.technologyreview.com/click.phdo?i=ef3d9773728b4dab862a248e88ad4d3a"&gt;Cheaper &lt;span class="highlighted0"&gt;Solar&lt;/span&gt; &lt;span class="highlighted1"&gt;Power&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description><link>http://www.orangeandyellowjellybeans.com/2008/06/examples-of-society-at-work-on-problem.htm</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (AcusticThoughts)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6837226.post-6219818975076074922</guid><pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 15:13:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-06-21T11:59:19.279-04:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Peer to Peer</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>economics</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Brave New World</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>altruism</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>acusticthoughts</category><title>Economics in the 21st Century</title><description>Two separate articles caught my attention on a similar topic - our gaining intelligence in the world of finance and economics.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The first involves a new breed of websites like &lt;a href="http://www.prosper.com"&gt;Prosper.com&lt;/a&gt; (by the way I happen to be a lender on this website) which is a peer to peer lending website. Peer to Peer Lending is a form of lending that brings the lenders and the borrowers directly in contact with each other, removing the banks from the equation. The &lt;a href="http://www.sparknotes.com/economics/macro/banking/section1.html"&gt;purpose of banks&lt;/a&gt; are to use their expertise to do exactly what these sites are doing - find people with capital to invest and find those with a need for loans and then, using their ability to value risk, make loans that bring profit to everyone involved. The study, titled &lt;a href="http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-06/ru-rus061908.php"&gt;"The Democratization of Personal Consumer Loans?"&lt;/a&gt;,  showed that lenders might be benefiting more from these sites because of higher rates of return than their traditional manner of savings and that borrowers might be benefiting more because of lower rates of interest that are available.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For those of us who believe in &lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/12.10/tail_pr.html"&gt;The Long Tail&lt;/a&gt; this is simply a logical procession. Banks came into being because they were needed - how do we pool resources and find people needing loans on a widespread area? For those of us who have learned to save (and &lt;a href="http://www.frbsf.org/publications/economics/letter/2005/el2005-30d.gif"&gt;there aren't many&lt;/a&gt;) the benefits of &lt;a href="http://www.savingadvice.com/blog/2006/09/23/10846_power-of-compound-interest.html"&gt;long-term compounding interest&lt;/a&gt; are &lt;a href="http://www.pfadvice.com/2006/01/15/compound-interest-manhattan-the-indians/"&gt;significant&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-06/sfi-teo061608.php"&gt;second article&lt;/a&gt; that I found speaks of altruism and how it applies to Economics.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"Sam Bowlers...points to new experimental evidence that people do often act against their own personal self-interest in favor of the common good, and they do so in predictable, understandable ways. Poorly-designed economic institutions fail to take advantage of intrinsic moral behavior and often undermine it."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Our default view on human beings is that we are all self-interested, short minded beasts looking out only for number one, and to a certain level there is some truth to this with a lot of people. But wonderfully things like morals have been ingrained in our culture and society and these things greatly affect how we choose to act. Of course you can argue that that those of us who are following morals are acting in our own interests as we are attempting to help ourselves in the long term by impressing our friends, making ourselves happy, doing it for our religious reasons or a million other excuses - but I see it being closer to human beings looking to benefit their society, which over the long term, benefits them. So long term self beneficial altruism?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A certain phrase comes to mind - &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_rising_tide_lifts_all_boats"&gt;"A rising tide lifts all boats."&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>http://www.orangeandyellowjellybeans.com/2008/06/economics-in-21st-century.htm</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (AcusticThoughts)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6837226.post-9012350630937626450</guid><pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 14:49:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-06-21T11:10:31.520-04:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>economics</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>africa</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>development</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>the intarnet thing</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>acusticthoughts</category><title>A Whole New Set of Problems</title><description>&lt;a href="http://allafrica.com/stories/200806201054.html"&gt;Mauritius: Call-Centre And BPO Sector Needs Lower International Bandwidth Prices to Stay Competitive&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The "great" thing about this article is that the reason for stress here is that competing in the international business world is the greatest concern. &lt;a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?q=Mauritius&amp;amp;ie=UTF8&amp;amp;t=h&amp;amp;z=5"&gt;Mauritius&lt;/a&gt; is a island nation located off of the coast of Madagascar in the Indian Ocean which itself is a much larger island nation located off of the coast of southeast Africa.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"Bandwidth is the petrol of the new global economy and as the price of actual petrol continues to go through the roof, it is an essential component of being able to sell "smart exports" based on "think-work" rather than simply minerals, produce or tourism."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Getting into these "smart exports" for a nation that is lacking in resources, land space or the traditional development path seems to be a very intelligent way to go - &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Asian_Tigers"&gt;Hong Kong, Taiwan and Singapore&lt;/a&gt; focused on education, services, exports to wealthy nations and high tech manufacturing to make their moves.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;With &lt;a href="http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-images/Technology/Pix/pictures/2008/02/01/SeaCableHi.jpg"&gt;internet cables&lt;/a&gt; being run all over the world there are going to be quite a few groups who will have the potential to create whole new paths to development. Skip the manufacturing and head straight to the &lt;a href="http://advancingknowledge.com/"&gt;knowledge economies&lt;/a&gt;. Might we skip the ravaging of the environment that occurs as so many countries develop? And since one key of the knowledge economy is that the populace must be decently educated and one potential trait is a generally higher standard of living- might there also be lesser political strife with that combination of education and wealth?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This is the firt time human beings on Earth have ever developed this world. This is the first time we have built out this planet. This is the first time we have done any of this. You and I are both part of the experiment.</description><link>http://www.orangeandyellowjellybeans.com/2008/06/whole-new-set-of-problems.htm</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (AcusticThoughts)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6837226.post-314764883918849632</guid><pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 08:43:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-06-21T04:44:01.389-04:00</atom:updated><title>Bhuddist Quote</title><description>Wise men don&amp;#39;t judge, they seek to understand.&lt;p&gt;By Wei Wu Wei</description><link>http://www.orangeandyellowjellybeans.com/2008/06/bhuddist-quote.htm</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (AcusticThoughts)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6837226.post-5677821493942375904</guid><pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 07:37:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-06-21T03:55:30.537-04:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Mars</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>life</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>water</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>acusticthoughts</category><title>Ice on Mars (officially)</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/phoenix/news/phoenix-20080620.html"&gt;NASA has officially found ice on Mars&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"It is with great pride and a lot of joy that I announce today that we have found proof that this hard bright material is really water ice and not some other substance," said Phoenix Principal Investigator Peter Smith of the University of Arizona.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We still haven't found official life anywhere else in the universe, but we do know that on Earth everywhere that we have found water-ice we have found life. Whether it be at the &lt;a href="http://www.divediscover.whoi.edu/hottopics/bacteria.html"&gt;bottom of the ocean feeding off of sulfur&lt;/a&gt;, pulled from &lt;a href="http://news.softpedia.com/news/Frozen-Fossils-Have-Been-Brought-Back-to-Life-62040.shtml"&gt;100,000 to 8 &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;million&lt;/span&gt; year old ice cores from Antarctica&lt;/a&gt; or bacteria living in the sky and potentially &lt;a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/02/080228174801.htm"&gt;having significant affect on rain cycles&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The goal of the &lt;a href="http://phoenix.lpl.arizona.edu/science.php"&gt;Phoenix Lander&lt;/a&gt; was to find a spot where they might find organic molecules and to do that they aimed for what seemed to be large amounts of water ice just below the surface of the dirt. Well, before they even began to dig for ice they found it and quite possibly are standing on top of a sea of frozen water.</description><link>http://www.orangeandyellowjellybeans.com/2008/06/ice-on-mars-officially.htm</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (AcusticThoughts)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6837226.post-9098316099500349260</guid><pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 07:13:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-06-21T03:34:47.496-04:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>self-sufficiency</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>energy</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>acusticthoughts</category><title>Energy Independent</title><description>How would you like to make 100% of your energy (car and home)? &lt;a href="http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=hydrogen-house&amp;amp;sc=rss"&gt;This man did&lt;/a&gt; and he is starting a business. I know the first round of things cost him $500,000 to complete his ideas and he had significant help from industry, but I also know that the first of many things costs a significant amount of money to make before we figure out how to do them economically (I know the &lt;a href="http://www.hpmuseum.org/hp9100.htm"&gt;first calculator developed by Hewlett-Packard&lt;/a&gt; was almost $5000).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The ideas here are the most significant things -&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What do we do when there is no sun?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;    "The remaining 80 kilowatt-hours recharge the batteries—which provide electricity for the house at night—and power the electrolyzer, which splits the molecules of purified tap water into hydrogen and oxygen. The oxygen is vented and the hydrogen goes into the tanks where it is stored for use in the cold, dark winter months."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What about my TV and microwave and washer/dryer?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;    "On a typical summer day, the solar panels drink in and convert sunlight to about 90 kilowatt-hours of electricity, according to Strizki. He consumes about 10 kilowatt-hours daily to run the family's appliances, including a 50-inch plasma television, along with his three computers and stereo equipment, among other modern conveniences."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Where do I get the fuel to make all this happen?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;    "I can make fuel out of sunlight and water—and I don't even use the water," he notes. "If it's raining, it's fuel. If it's sunny, it's fuel. It's all fuel."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Don't fear! For those of you who happen to be rich - lets get on this and set an example so we poor folk can get into this energy creation business.</description><link>http://www.orangeandyellowjellybeans.com/2008/06/energy-independent.htm</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (AcusticThoughts)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6837226.post-650211716639572329</guid><pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 06:45:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-06-21T03:13:17.898-04:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>the intarnet thing</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>history</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>acusticthoughts</category><title>The Web Time Forgot</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/17/science/17mund.html?pagewanted=1&amp;amp;_r=2&amp;amp;hp"&gt;The internet in 1934?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"In 1934, Otlet sketched out plans for a global network of computers (or “electric telescopes,” as he called them) that would allow people to search and browse through millions of interlinked documents, images, audio and video files. He described how people would use the devices to send messages to one another, share files and even congregate in online social networks. He called the whole thing a “réseau,” which might be translated as “network” — or arguably, “web.”&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What I find interesting about this article is that we forgot about this person. His revolutionary ideas fell to the wayside in a volatile society that was at war and not yet ready for his concepts. It makes me think about other great ideas that may have been &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_of_Alexandria"&gt;lost and never found again&lt;/a&gt;. There are a few ideas and objects that were seemingly lost forever - &lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2008/06/dayintech_0619"&gt;the Earth being round and how large it is&lt;/a&gt;, the &lt;a href="http://www.britishmuseum.org/explore/highlights/highlight_objects/aes/t/the_rosetta_stone.aspx"&gt;Rosetta Stone&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://victorian.fortunecity.com/duchamp/410/katana.html"&gt;Japanese sword making techniques&lt;/a&gt;,  and who knows what that was dreamed up by &lt;a href="http://www.dribbleglass.com/divinci/divinci.htm"&gt;Leonardo da Vinci&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;One of the thing that sets human beings apart from our competitors on this planet was that our ancestors collected and passed down significant knowledge to us. This collection of knowledge over time builds up and we no longer have to rediscover our reality every few generations.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What else is out there?</description><link>http://www.orangeandyellowjellybeans.com/2008/06/web-time-forgot.htm</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (AcusticThoughts)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6837226.post-5716968539426408552</guid><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 18:06:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-06-20T16:18:41.429-04:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>advertising</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>pharmaceuticals</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>acusticthoughts</category><title>The United States of Advertising</title><description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/from_our_own_correspondent/7453357.stm"&gt;Pharmaceutical Advertising on TV&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;How many drugs do we allow to be advertised on television? Well, there is alcohol. That is a big driver of revenue for the networks (especially sporting events). In 1971 the &lt;a href="http://www.tvparty.com/vaultcomcig.html"&gt;last cigarette ad&lt;/a&gt; was run on television. And since all of the other drugs were outlawed long before television was invented we never experienced cocaine or opium or marijuana.  Remember, "the whole point of them is that it is not considered safe to let us simply buy them over the counter."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Do you wake up in the morning tired? Are you tired before you go to bed? Do you have hunger? Do you sometimes get stressed out by life's real issues? Do I get drugs now doctor?</description><link>http://www.orangeandyellowjellybeans.com/2008/06/united-states-of-advertising.htm</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (AcusticThoughts)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6837226.post-6364779959257223777</guid><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 08:33:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-06-20T12:48:07.966-04:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>optimism</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>the future</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>acusticthoughts</category><title>It'll Never Work</title><description>Oftentimes, I am mocked for my "overly optimistic" view of the world. I believe that &lt;a href="http://www.orangeandyellowjellybeans.com/2008/06/solar-power-updates.htm"&gt;solar energy will power our world&lt;/a&gt; (even though technically it already does), I believe that life can be extended to &lt;a href="http://www.orangeandyellowjellybeans.com/2008/06/stem-cell-researchers-give-old-muscle.htm"&gt;make us near-immortal&lt;/a&gt;, I believe in &lt;a href="http://www.orangeandyellowjellybeans.com/2008/06/three-super-earths-found-circling-sun.htm"&gt;alien beings floating around&lt;/a&gt; out there wondering about us and I believe that the common person &lt;a href="http://www.orangeandyellowjellybeans.com/2008/06/self-printing-3d-printer.htm"&gt;will create their own products&lt;/a&gt; and throw off the shackles of "the man." And this is only since the beginning of June...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But I don't think that I am optimistic, I think I am a realist. I think this because I am logical. The universe is a place with rules. And, for the most part, I have seen most of these rules stay constant. Within these rules various things are happening - atoms spinning, planets building, stars exploding and life coming into being on this planet. I also happen to be living at the most recent point in human history (so are all of the living folks on this planet) and am able to see into the past to view our history of failure and success. Human beings have done some amazing things - fire, society, culture, writing, agriculture, mechanization, electricity, suffrage, going to the moon and so on and so forth. I take these various points of knowledge and combine that with the aforementioned universe with rules and comes to a conclusion:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Anything that could be possible is possible.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Now, that is a funny phrase. What could be possible? Well...quite a lot. First off - the rules of physics and quantum mechanics and thermodynamics and all these things that we are still learning - are unfinished. We haven't found all of the rules yet. Secondly - the universe that we live in is causal. If (x) happens then (y) results. Of course we don't know all of what happens (y) when (x) occurs - we are still learning and I don't mind not having all of the knowledge of the universe just yet. But with knowing that I do live in a universe where there is no magic and no truly unconnected occurrences happening I also suddenly know that every rule can be analyzed and manipulated.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For instance, me learning that the world is not made of &lt;a href="http://www.exclassics.com/arist/arist61.htm"&gt;water, fire, phlegm and dirt&lt;/a&gt; but of the &lt;a href="http://www.elementsdatabase.com/Images/periodic_table.gif"&gt;periodic table&lt;/a&gt; allows me to begin to build a much sharper picture of the world. I begin to use individual materials on their own and learn how each one of those items acts in the world. Copper is a conductor of electricity, oxygen is what we breath, mercury is liquid at room temperate and uranium is highly unstable. Once I learn that &lt;a href="http://www.3rd1000.com/history/electrons.htm"&gt;atoms can be broken&lt;/a&gt; apart into smaller pieces I then began to think about those tiny pieces - what are they? what do they do? And then an &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Einstein"&gt;individual&lt;/a&gt; comes along and shakes up everything we know about the universe because of what he has been reading. He predicts &lt;a href="http://www.firstscience.com/site/articles/coles.asp"&gt;light (space) bending&lt;/a&gt; around heavy objects and he says something very scary about breaking atoms apart and the equation &lt;a href="http://www.doug-long.com/einstein.htm"&gt;e=mc^2&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This knowledge means something. This knowledge has continued on today toward things like a &lt;a href="http://www.iter.org/a/index_nav_1.htm"&gt;fusion reactor&lt;/a&gt; being built in the south of France, a &lt;a href="http://lhc2008.web.cern.ch/LHC2008/index-E.html"&gt;giant particle accelerator&lt;/a&gt; that might make black holes and nanotechnology that is going to rewrite all of the rules.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I found a &lt;a href="http://www.lhup.edu/%7Edsimanek/neverwrk.htm"&gt;website&lt;/a&gt; in the last couple of days that told me all of the quotes by famous and smart people about how something wouldn't and couldn't work. And so many of them were proven wrong. With the knowledge we have acquired, with the things we have done and with the patterns that are out there - there is no reason to believe that anything can't be done. Gravity can be manipulated. Human beings can be tweaked to be smarter and faster and stronger, and, possibly even live forever. And we will overcome our limitations on this planet to make it a better planet and then we will apply that knowledge to other planets.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We just have to be patient and wait and learn.</description><link>http://www.orangeandyellowjellybeans.com/2008/06/itll-never-work.htm</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (AcusticThoughts)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6837226.post-1707441127457036530</guid><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 18:21:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-06-20T04:36:07.893-04:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>fair trade</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>acusticthoughts</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>globalization</category><title>Globalization: The Ever Evolving Beast Begins Moving Manufacturing Home</title><description>&lt;a href="http://yaleglobal.yale.edu/display.article?id=10958"&gt;The Cost of Shipping Goods is Rising&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"The cost of shipping a standard, 40-foot container from Asia to the East        Coast has already tripled since 2000 and will double again as oil prices        head toward $200 a barrel, says Jeff Rubin, chief economist at CIBC        World Markets in Toronto."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A company moved its manufacturing center to Kentucky from China after seeing the cost of shipping increase and keep increasing. This bodes well for globalization, and in the long term for you and I. Why?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To truly have fair &amp;amp; equal trade between countries you need to have fair &amp;amp; equal rules. The key point in this are taxes and government regulations in the various regions of the world. Most countries don't have the same environmental regulation (make note that for all of the past we have ravaged our country and only now are we pushing hard environmentally) or the same legal framework that increases costs of American firms.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When the costs associated with damaging the environment (more expensive food due to lost land and damaged water supplies, destruction of pristine lands that lessen revenue from tourism, unsustainable mining practices that increase the long term costs of retrieval of goods) are added back into the equation, when the costs of the ailing population (lower individual productivity due to more missed work days because of sickness, lower general production because of mental well being associated with the stresses of lack of nature and open spaces) are added back into the equation the costs begin to rise for these producers. It took America a long time to recognize, or stop ignoring these things and we are now paying our own price for our unsustainable long term development.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Now a days some of the more common economic issues are showing up - the American currency has &lt;a href="http://www.oanda.com/convert/fxhistory"&gt;fallen about 15%&lt;/a&gt; against the Chinese Yuan since 2006. That means that Chinese goods have increased in cost by 22% since 2006. Chinese inflation is roaring ahead well into the double digits due to wage increases, competition from firms eating valuable resources and - very importantly - the &lt;a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/06/20/asia/20china.php"&gt;Chinese government is removing&lt;/a&gt; some of the subsidies it places on fuel.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;With the cost of fuel increasing &lt;a href="http://www.inflationdata.com/inflation/Inflation_Rate/Historical_Oil_Prices_Table.asp"&gt;40% alone in 2008&lt;/a&gt; the containers that ship goods across the country are turning out to be much dearer in price to producers of goods. The above article mentions per container prices increasing 15% already in 2008 and another 5% hike is expected shortly. This will wear away at the financial benefit of shipping goods long distance.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This is the beauty of global trade. The imbalances that exist in the world - lower labor costs, incorrectly valued currency, undervalued fuel and unaccounted for costs - are slowly evened out. It will take a long time because it took 75 years for the United States to become dominant and over valued, but as long as we are patient we will all benefit.</description><link>http://www.orangeandyellowjellybeans.com/2008/06/globalization-ever-evolving-beast.htm</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (AcusticThoughts)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6837226.post-6319565783061550193</guid><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 08:36:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-06-19T05:10:26.119-04:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>solar power</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>acusticthoughts</category><title>Solar Power Updates</title><description>A couple of news updates from the solar power world...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.nanosolar.com/blog3/"&gt;Nanosolar Achieves 1GW CIGS Deposition Throughput&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What this actually means is that Nanosolar is able to print out 1GW worth of solar power sheets in a single year for about $1.65 million of hardware investment plus cost of materials, energy, labor and who knows what else - so lets quintuple the cost of these machines to get to 1GW of printing ability. Now, 1GW of power generates about enough electricity to power about 700,000 homes. According to the 2001 census there were about 120,000,000 homes in the United States. Lets say that number is now...140,000,000 (I have no idea really, and I am pretty sure the number of homes in the US hasn't grown 14% in seven years, but this is just fun remember?). That means to power the homes in the United States we need to produce about 200 GW worth of solar power.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So we could produce enough thin film solar cells to power all of the homes in the USA for about $1.65 billion. We spend more than that each day (yes, that is right - each day) on oil. Every building in the United States need to have mandatory solar films placed on their roof. Every window needs to have mandatory solar films covering them. Every car on its roof and every potential surface you can conceive of need have solar films covering them. Barack, you listening?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-06/sfi-pas061608.php"&gt;By Adding Impefections We Increase Efficiency&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While talking about flaws and how they make the world better we could get into long philosophical discussions (the human frailty is what makes us so wonderful and if we were "perfect" to where would be evolve and what would we change?), in physics we have a very nice experiment that shows we can increase the efficiency of a solar panel by adding imperfections to it. By making a surface rougher you increase the surface area increasing the number of places for the chemical reactions to occur.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Just another discovery...</description><link>http://www.orangeandyellowjellybeans.com/2008/06/solar-power-updates.htm</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (AcusticThoughts)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6837226.post-2092460665757284295</guid><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 08:21:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-06-19T04:35:17.566-04:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>psychology</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>acusticthoughts</category><title>Psychology based upon Environment</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-06/uow--dtg061608.php"&gt;In an insane society the sane populate the prisons.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;ADHD in Kenyan nomads is shown to be beneficial to those who are still living in the bush whereas those with ADHD who have settled down into modern life are hurt by the "disorder."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Something interesting I heard from a PhD psychology student friend of mine recently - something is only a disorder when it affects your life in a negative manner. An individual who happens to be a modern day paranoid living in the time of the 1950's Communist witch hunt might actually be considered quite a normal member of society back in the day - because the logic says that paranoia isn't an issue until it negatively affects your life. And back then paranoia might have actually benefited you because there is the chance of greater social esteem for talking to the cops or FBI about every person who showed a tinge of socialist leaning (cus dammit - those reds needed to be taken down!). Yet today, that paranoid gets medication and therapy sessions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What this really says to me is that psychology supports conformity because it benefits the individual. Is this true though? Isn't it true that those who fight against the tide, those who have looked at the naysayers and said down with your close minded logic, those who have stood up against the masses - haven't those people brought the most benefit to society? And in the end, doesn't an advancing society benefit the individual the most? The changing perceptions of mental disorders based upon societal norms troubles me. It is a system designed to to push the status quo and it seems to fly in the face of evolution.</description><link>http://www.orangeandyellowjellybeans.com/2008/06/psychology-based-upon-environment.htm</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (AcusticThoughts)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6837226.post-3577816852032388973</guid><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 07:35:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-06-19T04:08:37.775-04:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>power</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>psychology</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>acusticthoughts</category><title>When the Powerless Rise Up</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-06/afps-wtp061608.php"&gt;The Legitimacy of your Power Affects how you use it.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"The research shows that when given legitimate power, participants were more likely to take action than those legitimately assigned to a position of powerlessness. When power was conceived illegitimately, the powerful no longer took more action and risks than the powerless."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Those who should be in positions of power were smarter with that power and actually acted with that power. Those who were not in power when they were supposed to be in power tended to act as if they had power when illegitimates were in power. And, very importantly, those who were in power but weren't supposed to be tended to not use that power well or not even use the power at all; in essence they were afraid of the tool they had and didn't yield it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="The%20research%20shows%20that%20when%20given%20legitimate%20power,%20participants%20were%20more%20likely%20to%20take%20action%20than%20those%20legitimately%20assigned%20to%20a%20position%20of%20powerlessness.%20When%20power%20was%20conceived%20illegitimately,%20the%20powerful%20no%20longer%20took%20more%20action%20and%20risks%20than%20the%20powerless."&gt;Another study I read&lt;/a&gt; showed that people who had power were more able cognitively because of being assigned that power, whereas those who were assigned to low power positions lost some of their cognitive abilities.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What the first studies say is that human beings innately know when we should or shouldn't be in a position of power. The second study shows that simply being put in a powerless positions tends to make us less able. This lends credence to the theory that success breeds success and also explains a little the continuance of power.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But another interesting thing was shown, and this interests me even more. Those who were supposed to be in power but weren't tended to act as if they were in power more so. This gives me a sense of joy about the human species, which in essence is like any other animal on the planet. You take away my evolutionarily given rights and I will find you and take them back.</description><link>http://www.orangeandyellowjellybeans.com/2008/06/when-powerless-rise-up.htm</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (AcusticThoughts)</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6837226.post-2390636861506289033</guid><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 21:43:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-06-19T04:17:20.994-04:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>obama</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>israel</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>populism</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>acusticthoughts</category><title>Obama: I Support You, but I Fear You</title><description>Barack, you said something that scared me recently. First, let me say that I think Obama is the best candidate that is running for office, so this is more of a constructive criticism than anything. But this verbal gaffe resonated around the world, so it is a harsh criticism.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The first thing that I heard was regarding Middle Eastern policy. On Wednesday, June 4th, Obama attended the &lt;span class="lead"&gt;&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AIPAC"&gt;American Israel Public Affairs Committee&lt;/a&gt; policy conference. There had been negative feedback in the media that Obama wasn't pro-Israel "enough" and that is a tough thing to take while running for President with a state like Florida having considerable affect on who gets into office. At this conference Obama &lt;a href="http://middleeast.about.com/od/usmideastpolicy/a/me080605.htm"&gt;gave a speech&lt;/a&gt; that touched on many topics - the evil of the Holocaust, the increased threat of violence against Israel by Iran &amp;amp; Syria, Hamas &amp;amp; Hizbullah, and the very important the need for a Palestinian state. But one key statement caught the attention of the world:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"&lt;/span&gt;Jerusalem will remain the capital of Israel and it must remain undivided."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Now, as we are all arm chair analysts to what is actually going on in Mr. Obama's mind, we are making a bit of a leap as to what he meant. Does Obama believe that the city of Jerusalem ought to be completely controlled by Israel for Israel and populated only by Israelites? Does Obama believe that Jerusalem should be a city peacefully populated by people of two countries without &lt;a href="http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1212659672984&amp;amp;pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull"&gt;&lt;span class="lead"&gt;"barbed wire and checkpoints"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt; but absolutely one city and an invisible legal line?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The JPost.com article quoted responses from an Obama advisor that attempted to clarify the meaning of the phrase. The damage was done. As quoted in the article:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="lead"&gt;"In the current context, everyone understands that saying 'Jerusalem... must remain undivided' means that the holy city must remain unified under Israeli rule, as it has been since 1967," &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="lead"&gt;Nathan Diament, director of public policy for the Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations, explained.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The reaction by others was just as strong:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;"Of one thing I am certain: Obama's declarations at the AIPAC conference are very, very bad for peace. And what is bad for peace is bad for Israel, bad for the world and bad for the Palestinian people," &lt;a href="http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/avnery/1212871846"&gt;Uri Avenry.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/05/AR2008060503510.html?nav=rss_politics"&gt;President of the Palestinian Authority, Mahmoud Abbas&lt;/a&gt;, said, "This statement is totally rejected. The whole world knows that holy Jerusalem was occupied in 1967, and we will not accept a Palestinian state without having Jerusalem as the capital of a Palestinian state."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Do we all dream that a city as important to human history should be peaceful and taken care of and represent all that is good in us? Of course, we all do.&lt;span class="lead"&gt; As the President of the United States of America you have a responsibility to know the consequences of your words. You have a responsibility to know who you are saying them to. Barack, please, continue to pay attention to the words you speak and let us know, without delay, exactly what they mean because you now have that responsibility to us. Us being the world.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description><link>http://www.orangeandyellowjellybeans.com/2008/06/obama-i-support-you-but-i-fear-you.htm</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (AcusticThoughts)</author></item></channel></rss>